The chart below indicates the primary uses of Internet in Japan in the years 1995 to 2005.
The pie charts illustrate the main usage of the Internet in Japan in the last 10 years, starting in 1995.
Overall, it is noticeable that the Internet had significantly increased its figures for working and studying over the period, whereas in communication and entertainment considerably declined.
The main function of the internet in Japan was dominant for working and studying which began the period with roughly a third of its total and about a quarter respectively. The trend continued to grow until the end year given to nearly half of it's overall and just above a quarter respectively.
The Japanese made used the internet for entertainment with data from just nearly a quarter and above a tenth of its total in the last 10 years. This marked the third-highest point among the four categories from 1995 to 2005. In terms of communication, it had only nearly a fifth of the total from the beginning, and the percentage end up the period to almost the same value of entertainment, a tenth of the total.
- The chart below indicates the primary uses of Internet in Japan in the years 1995 to 2005. 73
- The table below shows the amount fish caught, in thousands tonnes , in 2008 and 2015 by eight European countries. 78
- The charts show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1998 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different mode of transport. 56
- The graphs below shows the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Portugal and Italy from 1967 to 2007 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d just above a quarter respectively. The Japanese made used the internet for ent...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88439306358 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95836320631 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6582338261 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167851190204 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816451890033 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669376695979 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109455620191 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069904459569 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.