the chart below show the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in a state in canada Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar graph depicts the information Regarding the sum of land utilised for producing Grain from 1990 to 2010 in a Canadian territory. The data is calibrated in acres.

On analysing, it is evident that in the last decade of 20th century the prominent site for farming was in Redfield accounted for 60 acres . On the other hand 30 to 40 acres of land was accumulated by both Sunny Valley and spring plains followed by the least of 5 acres by other areas. In the 2000. The land did not faced any major changes.

Further more the production of wheat area increased by 5 acres in the sunny Valley and dropped to half in the plains and lowest to 5 acres on other sites. In the next decade of 2010 there were some significant changes in the land used for farming wheat. Redfield farming dropped by 5 acres and it came to only 30 acres in the valley, whereas in spring plains the land was limited to only 21 acres for wheat growing.

Overall it can be established that the most preferred place for farming wheat was red fields during the given three decades and the least contribution is seen by the other areas of the state.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...g was in Redfield accounted for 60 acres . On the other hand 30 to 40 acres of lan...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'face'
Suggestion: face
...er areas. In the 2000. The land did not faced any major changes. Further more the ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44927536232 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35798071238 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5731167004 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098271541342 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041264721966 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481539242999 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725379591469 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385245204633 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.