The Chart below show the males and females arrested over 5 years and the reasons for the most recent arrests

The given circular charts highlight the information about the number of imprisoned men and women, and the bar graph illustrate the reasons of the imprisonment from the year 1990 to 1994. The data is given in per centum.

Overall, it is evident that number of significant arrested men are more as compared to women, whereas, public drinking is the main factor due to which they were atrested.

It can be seen that, 32% males had been, however, only less than one in ten females were arrested. Moreover, in terms of drink driving, number of males were likely to be higher(26%) than females which was just, 14% who were being arrested in this case. Furthermore, in the matter of breeach of order, number of arrested men and women were nearly 17% and 12% respectively.

With regards to the remaining reasons of the imprisonment, theft case accounted for 16% of men and 12% of women, while, number of male and female being arrested for other reasons were more in comparison of it. As well as, least amount of both the gender had no reason why they were arrested.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (8 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...er of significant arrested men are more as compared to women, whereas, public drin...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...ere more in comparison of it. As well as, least amount of both the gender had no reason...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in fact, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49479166101 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4390149173 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181763810506 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749004058122 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630420604087 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105127707516 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057997296838 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.