The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week, in industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant.
A glance at the bargraph provided reveals the number of hours spent on work per week by industrial workers in France, Denmark, Sweden and The United Kingdom in 2002. It is manifest from the graph that the proportion of workers who worked 36 to 40 hours in a single week in Denmark, Sweden and the UK.
In France, below 15 percent of people worked under 30 working hours per week, While 40 to 50 percent workers came to work for 31 to 40 hours in factory. 20 percent people worked 46 to 50 hours. However, rarely people worked 45 and 50 hours or above.
Denmark and Sweden witnessed the highest proportion of people working for 36-40 hours, which was quite different from France. Workers of Sweden were always spend more time for work to compare with Denmark.
It is interesting to note that the UK, the percentage of people working 50+ hours per week was highest then other three countries.
Overall, France was a country where people work least hours, whereas the Sweden's people spent the most time behind working.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...m France. Workers of Sweden were always spend more time for work to compare with Denm...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ge of people working 50+ hours per week was highest then other three countries. Overall, F...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'work the least'.
Suggestion: work the least
...rall, France was a country where people work least hours, whereas the Swedens people spent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25130963258 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8604973895 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142458107609 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713156737472 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422189912465 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858739907829 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330968657881 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.