The bar graph elucidates that how much time workers spent on their job place. The data is given of the year 2002 and it is collected from four different nations of Europe.
Overall, maximum number of individuals prefer to work around 36 to 40 hours per week in all countries except France. Whereas all four countries had the minimum number of people who worked 1-14 hours.
At the first glance, In France; Denmark; Sweden and the UK, 36%; 70%; 80% and 50% workers worked 36-40 hours in a week respectively. Employers who worked 46 to 50 hpw were around a fifth in the UK and one in ten in France. Those who were working 41 to 45 hpw were between 10 to 15 percentage in France, Denmark and the UK but in Sweden, 30% worked these many hours. Working persons who were toiled above 50 hours were 21% in the UK while rest of the countries had approximately 9%.
Turning to the further information, countries which had human beings who worked 1 to 14 hours in 7 days where the same around 9%. France had 30%; Denmark had 10%; Sweden had 19% and the UK had 7% population, their working efficiency was 15-20 hours and 21-30 hours. Consecutively 35%, 51%, 24% and 10% workers can work 31 to 35 hpw in Sweden, France, Denmark and the UK.
- The illustrations below show how chocolate is produced 56
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 85
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in UK who use the internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er week in all countries except France. Whereas all four countries had the minimum numb...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44933920705 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40073151537 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7267021606 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115601743805 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568360272223 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443478794451 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085570237989 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583331828276 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.