The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, will projection till 2050.
The given histogram highlights the information about the whole world population had shown by 4 countries: India, China, USA and japan, from 1950 to 2000, and estimated population in the year 2050. It is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that, in the year 1950, China had the highest population in comparison to other three nations, which were over a quarter. Despite of minute fall in the population of china, in the year 2000, still it had peak population in the world. In addition to this, it is estimated that the population of china will reach approximately 19% by 2050. Moreover, population of Japan remained the lowest in the century from 1950 to 2050.
Moving further, India had showed opposing trend to china as population of India is 15%, which was considerably lower than china. However, population rose minutely to 19% and is expected to have the highest population in the world. Apart from all this, population of USA falled from 10% to 8% from 1950 to 2000 and it is predicted that population will be steady in the year 2050.
Overall, it is evident that china lead in population for first half of century, but India will over come it in the other half of century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Jarneet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Jarneet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Jarneet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Jarneet kaur | 67 | view |
- The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The given chart below shows the participation of Australian chilly in sports outside school hour in 2014 64
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010. 73
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like the very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 67
- Some people believe that television is a powerful educational tool Other people believe that television is nothing more than mindless entertainment and should be discouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Discuss both view and 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, so, still, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71770334928 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60738772164 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492822966507 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3062949198 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301453941534 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136363730929 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901195748623 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201642003857 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831748978678 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.