the chart below show that UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go in to full- time work did after leaving college in 2008 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

the chart below show that UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go in to full- time work did after leaving college in 2008
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graphs represents what UK graduates and postgraduates did after leaving college in 2008.
On the first graph. it show that 17,735 graduate students sought part time employment in 2008 while 3,500 did voluntary work and 29.665 decided to seek further study. According to the graph, 16,235 graduate students were unemployed after college, which is roughly almost the same amount as those who sough part time work.
On the second graph, we see that 2,535 UK postgraduates decided to study further which is slightly more than those who decided to take part time employment. Lastly, 1,625 UK postgraduate students were not in the work force. The overall trend shows that most of the students, graduates alike, sough out further education while only a small number of students in both group did voluntary work after leaving college. We will also notice that about a third in each group were unemployed. Lastly, the only difference that we will notice between the two group is the percentage on the amount of the students who went on to do part time work with only one third of the total amount in the graduate students and almost one - half with the postgraduate students.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-22 cocococo123 78 view
2017-01-31 Trangsunshine 78 view
2017-01-31 Trangsunshine 73 view
Essays by user Trangsunshine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'represent'.
Suggestion: represent
The graphs represents what UK graduates and postgraduates di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graphs represents what UK graduates and postgraduates did after le...
^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... college in 2008. On the first graph. it show that 17,735 graduate students soug...
^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shows'?
Suggestion: shows
...llege in 2008. On the first graph. it show that 17,735 graduate students sought pa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ow that 17,735 graduate students sought part time employment in 2008 while 3,500 did volu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...most the same amount as those who sough part time work. On the second graph, we see tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...tly more than those who decided to take part time employment. Lastly, 1,625 UK postgradua...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... sough out further education while only a small number of students in both group did voluntary wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...mount of the students who went on to do part time work with only one third of the total a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91919191919 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47992877236 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3426785156 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293148004721 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133980969224 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999897568551 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254380192507 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650688033035 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.