The bar charts illustrate the prospects of the UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not decide to have a full-time job after they graduated in 2008.
Looking more closely at the first chart, further study was the major decisions for the undergraduates in UK, with approximately 30000 students planned to receive higher education. By strike contrast, only 3500 students decided to work as volunteers after graduation. In the same year, the number of unemployed graduates and the part-time employees were similar, with around 18000 and 16000 students respectively.
According to the second chart, around 2800 postgraduate students planned to study further, which was the dominant destination for postgraduates as well. Meanwhile, roughly 2500 postgraduates were employed as part-time workers, which was slightly fewer than those who planned to study further. Finally, 1625 postgraduate students were still unemployed while only 345 students participated in voluntary work.
In general, it is apparent that the most popular destination for both UK graduates and postgraduates was further study, but only a minimal proportion of students chose to work as volunteers.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, second, still, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68361581921 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08112202046 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621468926554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4540835982 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245082677018 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118385176453 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891386554096 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177792229964 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996402498952 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.