The chart below shows the amount of good transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
The figure elucidates the number of good transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002. At first glance, it is evident that pipeline has become the merely aspect which did not faced a palpitation and is measured in million tonnes.
To begin with, there was a gradual oscillation in the amount of the road, water and rail that have been transported in the UK. These aspects, initially, stood approximately at two-thirds of 60 for water and rail and at well above 60 for the road, Unfortunately, it waved consistently over the following 28 years where it finished to just below 100 for the road, just over six-tenths of 100 for water and just across two-fifths of 100 for rail by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, the number of pipeline that was transported in the UK uplifted significantly from 1974, which made up at well under a half of 40, through to 1994, which constituted at just beyond 20. Afterwards, it remained stable in the next 8 years.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- The changes in the layout of the Woodward university. 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 73
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... faced a palpitation and is measured in million tonnes. To begin with, there was a g...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65294117647 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77233615402 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9364662449 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18304459968 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111024432685 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128011931796 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129653586805 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544155028265 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.