The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
Leisure time in a typical week in hour- by sex and employment status, 1998-99.
The comparison in free time enjoyed in a week typically by five various status of employment based on two genders from 1998 to 1999 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in hours.
Overall, the amount of leisure time spent by men in all categories was higher than that of the counterpart sex. However, there were no data in male employed in part-time jobs.
As per data, the figure for unemployed men broke a record as the highest at more than 80 hours, followed by the retired them, with a slight gap of a half hour. However, that for the employed ones in full time works accounted for a half of the former's time.
When it came to the females, the unemployment and retired women almost reached time of unemployed men, sharing a same figure to enjoy weekly hours. Furthermore, expended free time of housewives was bigger than that of part-time female workers, with a gap of ten hours. Turning to the full-time those, they enjoyed only the hours at below a half of maximum data recorded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... However, that for the employed ones in full time works accounts for a half of the former...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59659090909 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47929832741 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8187712659 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382073934128 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157632641827 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712048172031 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226959536898 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651878766108 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.