The graph below shows the top priorities by business companies in the USA in 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The comparison in top priorities of business firm based on three different sizes in the USA in 2016 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the companies were more likely to convert and increase the number of contacts or leads. However, they did not really prioritize to reduce the customer acquisition.
As per data, companies having size ranged from 26 to 200 employees gained the highest rate of converting and increasing contacts or leads, with almost three quarters and four fifths, respectively. Meanwhile, the firms owning the lowest size of workers shared a same proportion of these two priorities at 71%, then the figure for corporation having the biggest one was smaller than the former at around three fifths.
Turning to the revenue increase priority, this in the companies hiring more than 200 employees accounted for more than a half, being higher than the rest firms only making up in about two fifths. Furthermore, the both the small and middle size one prioritized their workers to provide ROI of marketing activities was not bigger as many as them in the large counterpart, at below a half and nearly a sixth, running. Eventually, reducing the cost of contact or lead was marked as the least popular way, showing the proportion at only under two fifths in all figures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, really, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99090909091 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66893670597 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.906163674 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107679591558 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482300721046 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622528342948 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802725496843 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755440382208 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.