The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain. The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar graph compares how much money Britishers from three income groups (high, average, and low) spent per person per week on hamburgers, pizza, and fish and chips in 1990. The line graph plots how much of each food they ate per week, on average, between 1970 and 1990.
Overall, the high income group spent more on fast food than the other two groups. Britishers ate much more junk food in 1990 than in 1970, especially fish and chips.
In detail, in 1990, weekly spending amounted to 77, 69 and 38 pence/person for the high, average and low income groups, respectively. Hamburgers were the most popular junk food in the high and average groups, compared to Fish&Chips for the low income group. In 1970, people ate 400 grams per person of junk food compared to 1000 in 1990. Most of the rise was due to fish & chips, which went up more than fivefold, 90 to 500 grams per person. The amount of hamburgers also increased from 200 grams per person to 290. In contrast, pizza declined from 300 to 200 grams per person
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | Sukh-73 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | pris | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 56
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55191256831 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22875789791 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.009529831 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161715166438 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767527493857 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384054660932 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125025605418 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019884862316 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.