The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
A glance at the provided bar chart reveals the number of money on purchasing six different items in Europe countries, including Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
On balance, Britons paid more money than others on all goods. Moreover, the money purchased for photographic film was highest in out of six items.
Most of the money was spent on photographic film in Britain, at nearly 170 thousand pounds, followed by that on toys and CDs in also Britain with approximately 165 thousand pounds, respectively. Additionally, Germany was the country, which wasted the smallest money in out of 4 countries, with nearly 140000 pounds for each.
The figures for Italy and France roughly lie on these two extremes, and money spent in Italy appears higher than that in France for almost items. In France, the most money spent on photographic film, at over 160,000 pounds, by contrast, the figure for tennis was the lowest one, around 145000 pounds, which also is the minimum figure shown on the chart. Furthermore, in Italy, the payment for all items shares a comparable figure with over 150 thousand pounds.
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past. Why? Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 78
- University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The diagram below show how leather goods are producted. 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61563186528 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.150155763 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845668811534 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405833389493 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350236902697 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610638082026 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330960974156 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.