The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables provide data regarding the sales of bananas and coffee in two years, 1999 and 2004, in five countries, including the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
Overall, the data shows that Switzerland is the leading country in selling bananas in both years. However, with the increasing trend in the sale of coffee, although the country took the first place in 1999, its place was quickly taken by the UK in 2004.
In 1990, the highest sale of fair trade-labelled coffee belonged to Switzerland, with three million euros, whereas in 2004, Switzerland doubled in sales, but the number was surpassed by the UK, with a dramatic peak from 1.5 million euros to 20 million euros, making the nation the leading coffee dealer in the five countries. During the same period, there was a slight increase, around 0.2 million euros, in the number of coffee sales in three other countries.
The second table illustrates the significant growth of the bananas sales, in which Switzerland dominated the sales with the rise from 15 million euros in 1999 to 47 million euros in 2004. The UK and Belgium also experienced an enormous increase in banana sales by 4.5 million euros and 3.4 million euros, respectively. In contrast to the rising trend that happened in other countries between 1999 to 2004, the sales of fairtrade labelled bananas in Sweden and Denmark dropped moderately by around one million euros.
- In many parts of the world people search for family history Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and show your opin 76
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 87
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 71
- In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem 67
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00423728814 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57497109814 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4969718281 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.625 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197457267383 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102166057792 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449604054737 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135707067357 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283317027272 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.