The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors
and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The bar chart below compares the yearly salary for doctors and other workers in several countries in the year 2004 in thousands US dollars.
Overall, It is clear that the pay for US doctors was higher than doctor's salary in the other countries. In each country, the annual pay of doctors was always higher than that of other workers.
The yearly salary of doctors in US was $120,000, while in Finland doctors received extremely low annually pay of $50,000. In France, and Switzerland doctors earned $70,000 per year, compared with around $60,000 yearly in Italy, Germany and Czech republic.
In contrast, the annual wages of other workers were much lower, at about $45,000 and $40,000 in the US and Switzerland, respectively. Other workers in France earned $30,000, a little more than other workers in Finland who had a yearly pay of $25,000. The lowest annual earnings were for other workers in Italy, Germany and the Czech Republic at exactly $20,000
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the Czech Republic at exactly 0,000
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33063832458 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49375 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.4757875405 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283662950679 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152969185378 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957465363476 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202223358739 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111715552509 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.