The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995,2005,2015
The bar chart illustrates the production of rice yearly in 4 different nations in 1995,2005 and 2015.
Overall, What stands out from the graph is that nation A was the highest figure in the manufacture of rice in 2015 while the lowest million tones witnessed by country D in both 1995 and 2005.
Looking at the graph for more details, country A reached a peak at 50 million tonnes in 2015 while more than 40 rice products were produced by nation B at the same time. In addition, the first place in country B was in 2005, however, it just equals the first runner-up in country A with nearly 50 million tonnes. Moreover, in 1995, the production of rice in both nations A and B even created a few and stands in last place with about 45 and 35, respectively.
On the other hand, countries C and D produced rice smaller than the 2 countries above and the highest figure in those countries was about 5 times as low as countries A and B. In nation D, the manufacture of rice in 1995 was the same as that in 2005, with nearly 5 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...acture of rice in 2015 while the lowest million tones witnessed by country D in both 19...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36923076923 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48559822851 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.9412726415 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354265245186 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190785673709 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923738891176 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267284341119 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801073309475 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.