The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The first line graph demonstrated how a country's households had changed in terms of how they used electrical equipment, while the second showed how this has influenced how much time people spent on weekly household tasks from 1920 to 2019.
According to the general trend, having a large number of electrical equipment was growing more and more common, which considerably reduced their need to do housework.
At the onset, it is clear that nobody used a refrigerator after 1920. The percentages are 30% and 40%, respectively, for the vacuum cleaner and washing machine. The three electrical appliances were between 50% and 60% until 1940. By 1960, the proportion usage of washing machines and vacuum cleaners had coincided at a rate of 70%. Moreover, the refrigeration has soared to 90%, over 40% more than twenty years ago. Merely 20 years later, 100% of people were using refrigerators, and that number didn't go down until the end of 2019. In 2000, the vacuum cleaner reached 100% and is still in operation today. Until 2019, the price of washing machines had only climbed by 5% since 1960.
Despite the fact that households own an rising number of electrical gadgets, they no longer need to perform as many household tasks as they once did, including cooking, cleaning, and laundry. In 1920, they worked 50 hours a week on average; in 1960, that number was 20 hours, and in 2019, it was 10.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 56
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... According to the general trend, having a large number of electrical equipment was growing more a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...re using refrigerators, and that number didnt go down until the end of 2019. In 2000,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Despite the fact that households own an rising number of electrical gadgets, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60352693811 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6568424381 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158678137078 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464210578272 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050099592613 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927103862749 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464101179038 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.