In this day and age, it is thought that some human activities have a detrimental impact on flora and fauna species. Many people hold the view that useful measures can make this situation become much better; however, these consequences caused by humans are too serious to solve so I believe that it is too late to do anything to save the creatures and plants.
On the one hand, there are a lot of negative effects on plants and animal species that make people relentless debates, but nowadays, it is too late to do active and disastrous impacts on them. First of all, humans have a habit of taking out rubbish everywhere such as in the forest, on the beach,...that’s why it’s a grave effect on flora and fauna. In addition, the exploitation of the forest and overhunting creatures will be devasting effects on the deprivation of animals of life as well as be harmful to the environment. For example, to remedy the situation, the government should impose policies and stringent fines for hunters. These solutions make them avert their destructive behaviors that damage the animals.
On the other hand, people believe that some effective measures can be taken to be curative solutions. The international treaties need to give a cleaner and greener projects to reversible this serious problem and support their original state. Moreover, Not until humans are self-aware that protecting animals is also protecting themselves will they take immediate actions. For instance, the state budget should set up a team that encourages the people need to protect plant and animal species.
In conclusion, although some human activities have grave effects on flora and fauna, I am of the opinion that some situations should be improved to prevent negative activities and make the environment to be better.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing to save the creatures and plants. On the one hand, there are a lot of nega...
^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...here such as in the forest, on the beach,...that’s why it’s a grave effect on flor...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive behaviors that damage the animals. On the other hand, people believe that s...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to protect plant and animal species. In conclusion, although some human activ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08417508418 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81094977342 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7442064146 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406985527582 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130168304157 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100112169181 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241803586264 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383977252392 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.