The bar chart illustrates the production of rice yearly in 4 different nations in 1995,2005 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that nation A produced the largest amount of rice in the three years mentioned while the lowest million tones rice manufactured was in country D during the same period
Looking at the graph for more details, country A manufactured more and more rice over the years until reaching a peak at 50 million tonnes in 2015 while there was a sharp fluctuation in rice production yearly in country B with the lowest was about 36 tonnes and the highest was more than 40 tonnes.
Turning to the two other countries, Both 2 countries C and D witnessed a maller amount of rice production which was under 10 tonnes during the period shown. In 1995 and 2005 country C had more than 5 tonne rice; however, country D was approximately half of that. The year 2015 saw the same amount of rice production in these 2 countries at about 5 tonnes.
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 11
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- The process diagram details the steps by which liquid chocolcate is produced from cocoa beans 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the production...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... three years mentioned while the lowest million tones rice manufactured was in country ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61142857143 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56968830001 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 161.355012318 43.030603864 375% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.4 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315177205235 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231288013001 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982594724303 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237049703854 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124219844673 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.