The chart below shows the average amount of time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles in the US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the average amount of time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles in the US. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The average amount of time invested by 4 car manufacturers to produce vehicles in the US is depicted by the rendered line graph from 1998 to 2005. The data has been calibrated in hours.

In an overview, the lines which shows the hours spent my all manufacturers follow both inclining and declining trend except the line of general motors which follow only declining trend during the time span of 7 years from 1998 to 2005.

After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that 32 hours was invested by general motors to produce vehicles in 1998 ,which was decreased by 10 hours in 2005 and reached to 22. Additionally, ford manufacturers increased slightly the amount of time consumption from 1998 to 2001, after that a dramatic decrease was observed in the investment of hours between 2001 and 2005 and approached to 21 hours in the last year.

Probing further to the remaining data, both Toyota and Honda manufacturers were consumed equal number of hours in the first year accounted as 22 for each . Moreover, after 1998 the figures of hours spent by honda and Toyota companies were started fluctuating between 20 and 24 till 2005, strikingly, in 2005 the figures of hours consumed by both manufacturers were again same.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-01 jashan978 73 view
2021-08-01 jashan978 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...neral motors to produce vehicles in 1998 ,which was decreased by 10 hours in 2005 ...
^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased by 10 hours in 2005 and reached to 22. Additionally, ford manufacturers inc...
^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the first year accounted as 22 for each . Moreover, after 1998 the figures of hou...
^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... honda and Toyota companies were started fluctuating between 20 and 24 till 2005,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85238095238 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69551195246 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.265861314 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.571428571 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128758118836 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718053317009 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826573331193 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101142884463 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762486756852 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.