The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart makes a comparison of the average regular higher and lower level of two particular objects which caused air pollution in four megacities in 2000.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Mexico City was in the top place for carrying the highest amount of both pollutant particles. While Los Angeles was in the least except N20.

To begin with Los Angeles and Mexico, the latter city had the highest level of min SO2 than all other cities which was 80. Whereas the former had level 2. The same trend for max SO2 in the case of Los Angeles, it was one-twentieth of Mexico City. Mexico City the level of max N2O was 207, on the other hand, Los Angeles had half of its level. In the case of min N20 which was three times higher than Los Angeles and the level was 113.

Turning to the other two cities, in Calcutta, the level of both max and min SO2 was 47 and 59 respectively. However, Beijing had half in case of min SO2 but more than twice in case of max. The level of min N2O was doubled than Beijing, while in the case of maximization both were almost similar levels.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...est amount of both pollutant particles. While Los Angeles was in the least except N20...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...SO2 than all other cities which was 80. Whereas the former had level 2. The same trend ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35436893204 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15112090372 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7715432402 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129818551324 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608638481421 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809338522356 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11285043276 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109565295824 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.