The line graph demonstrates the average spending of handheld phone and landline phone services annually from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that over the time spending the amount of money that was used to service the cell phones increasing, while in the case of residential phone opposite trend was observed.
In 2001, 200 dollar was utilized to service the cell phone, while residential phones cost 700 dollar which was three times than cell phone. In the next year, 100 dollar was increased in the case of mobile phone, on the other, in the case of hand residential phone, the service price climbed down to 650. Then the price gradually upgraded for cell phone and opposite was happened to home landline phone.
In 2006, the lines of price was crossed each other which was approximately 540 dollar. In the later year, the servicing money increased to 600 dollar, whereas residential went down to 480 dollar. Then rest of the period the amount of money of mobile phone services rose linearly and ended at close to 800 dollar. On the contrary, in 2010, home land phone service price decreased to 400 dollar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...ite trend was observed. In 2001, 200 dollar was utilized to service the cell phone,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...hone, while residential phones cost 700 dollar which was three times than cell phone. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... than cell phone. In the next year, 100 dollar was increased in the case of mobile pho...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 80, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... each other which was approximately 540 dollar. In the later year, the servicing money...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 144, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...r, the servicing money increased to 600 dollar, whereas residential went down to 480 d...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 189, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...r, whereas residential went down to 480 dollar. Then rest of the period the amount of ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 306, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...rose linearly and ended at close to 800 dollar. On the contrary, in 2010, home land ph...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 387, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...nd phone service price decreased to 400 dollar.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84693877551 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33225218403 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0007913817 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253443738664 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136314115454 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916556233458 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205476272504 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848717355616 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.