The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates, the amount of main air pollutants such as Sulfur dioxide and Disastrous oxide in different area's of the world (Los angels, Calcutta, Beijing, and Mexico ) during the year of 2000. the levels are calculated as in minimum and maximum.
Overall, Mexico city was the most polluted region in the chart, there were both maximum sulfur dioxide and maximum disastrous oxide reach at the peak level around 200 and 207 respectively. While, as compared to other cities Calcutta has all the given air pollutants in average level of below 60. Furthermore, Los angels shows the level of min sulfur oxide as mere 1.
To begin with Mexico city and Beijing, the max sulfur dioxide (SO2) has the 70 % advanced as in contrast with Beijing ( Around 130) with 200. where as, max disastrous oxide (N20) was 207 in mexico and only 56 in Beijing. In addition, mexico carrying min disastrous oxide in the range of 113, at the same time, Beijing has only 14%. Likewise, min sulfur dioxide also low level in Beijing such as 20, which rose to 80 in mexico.
In terms of air pollutants, Los angels was the lowest level in the chart. There was only maximum disastrous oxide shows at the highest level of 104 . As opposed to other cities, all other pollutants are below 40 only.
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that radio has become out of date and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news Do you agree or disagree OR With the development of media online there is no future for radio To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below Write at least 150 words 71
- Some people think that robots are important for human s future development Others think that robots have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os angels, Calcutta, Beijing, and Mexico during the year of 2000. the levels are ...
^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...g, and Mexico during the year of 2000. the levels are calculated as in minimum and...
^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 % advanced as in contrast with Beijing Around 130 with 200. where as, max disas...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...rast with Beijing Around 130 with 200. where as, max disastrous oxide N20 was 207 in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...rast with Beijing Around 130 with 200. where as, max disastrous oxide N20 was 207 in me...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... oxide shows at the highest level of 104 . As opposed to other cities, all other p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, likewise, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7130044843 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39405023824 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6357040141 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5833333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200066194346 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911984855677 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642511903121 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150134383978 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716961737368 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.