The prescribed charts give information on the median proportion of three nutrients which are sodium, saturated fat and added sugar present in distinct meals ingested in the USA, all of them are harmful if taken excessively.
A glance at the charts explicitly illustrates that major portion of nutrients are consumed in Dinner and lunch from all three kinds while the minimum level of nutrients is taken in breakfast compare to others.
It can be clearly depicted that the great percentage of all nutrients is taken in dinner in which sodium is exactly 43%, saturated fat stands at 37% and added sugar is slightly less than a quarter (23%). Meanwhile, Lunch contains the second-highest proportion of all nutrients. Interestingly, In the USA, citizens taking an almost identical amount of sodium (14%), saturated fat (16%) and added sugar (16%) in their breakfast.
However, the important point noticed in eating snacks that it contains considerably highest amount of added sugar (42%) which is almost equal to sodium intake in dinner. On the other hand, 19% of added sugar are presented in lunch with 10% more sodium and 7% higher saturated fat consecutively.
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- The chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals for three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 84
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considerably the highest'.
Suggestion: considerably the highest
...ticed in eating snacks that it contains considerably highest amount of added sugar 42% which is almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12698412698 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79193670358 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6234802883 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118963724662 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609365687308 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485433092559 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806372407267 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416361877485 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.