The prescribed charts give information on the median proportion of three nutrients which are sodium, saturated fat and added sugar present in distinct meals ingested in the USA. A glance at the charts explicitly illustrates that Dinner and lunch contain major portion of nutrients from all three kinds while the minimum level of nutrients is taken in breakfast compare to others.
It can be clearly noticed that the maximum percentage of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar is taken in dinner which is 43%, 37% and 23% respectively. Meanwhile, Lunch contains the second-highest proportion of all nutrients. Interestingly, In the USA, people taking an almost similar amount of sodium (14%), saturated fat (16%) and added sugar (16%) in their breakfast.
However, the important point noticed in eating snacks that it contains considerably highest amount of added sugar (42%) which is three times higher than sodium and double to saturated fat. In another point,
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- The chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals for three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 84
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considerably the highest'.
Suggestion: considerably the highest
...ticed in eating snacks that it contains considerably highest amount of added sugar 42% which is thre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uble to saturated fat. In another point,
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28758169935 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78234917959 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9008423668 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132000392886 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625482318201 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439066362864 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895452296693 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337788736658 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.