The chart below shows the change in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing houseworks in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the proportion of people who own electrical gadgets in comparison to the time-consuming in doing housework of a specific country over a period starting in 1920 and ending in 2019.
The first graph shows the percentage of using washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner from 1920 to 2019. There was significant increase in the amount of refrigerator from 0 percent in1920 to 55 percent in 1940 then rose steadily to reach 100 percent in 1980 and remain unchanged. Similar to refrigerator, vacuum cleaner started at highest point at 30 percent in 1920 then surged gradually before it reached the highest peak at 100 percent and stayed at the same until 2019. Meanwhile, washing machine hold the dominant in 1920 with 40 percent then rose significantly to 70 percent in 1960 before it experienced a downturn to 62 percent in 1980 and then surged steadily to reach the highest peak in 2019 with 73 percent.
Conversely to the increase of household appliances, the time spent for housework saw a significant decline with the plummet rapidly from 50 percent to 20 percent and continued to decrease until it hit the low at 10 percent in 2019.
In brief, there was a profound development of household gadgets during the period between 1920 and 2019 which is quite a different decrease in the number of hours used for housework per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-03 | Dương Nguyễn Nguyệt San | 67 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The charts below show the average of the percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten so much
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below shows the change in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing houseworks in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The charts below show the average of the percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten so much
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... highest peak in 2019 with 73 percent. Conversely to the increase of household appliances...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, so, then, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80859132933 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504347826087 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5974643591 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.142857143 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145918055682 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844526709572 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617665218704 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118614270708 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568036324603 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.