The chart below shows the changes in different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.
The line graph illustrates how often three different types of crime were made in Manchester city centre over 9-year period between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, the number of burglary in Manchester city centre decreased dramatically during the given period. In contrast, car theft and robbery remained relatively steady with minimal fluctuations over the same period.
To start with, in 2003, there was around 3400 cases of burglary. After minimal rise in 2004, it dropped sharply to reach its low in 2008 at around 1100 cases. Then, in 2009, it increased slightly and levelled out for the rest of the period.
Moving to the rest of the categories, in 2003, there was approximately 2400 cases of car theft, which was four times as much as that of robbery. However, in 2006, the rate of car theft declined gradually to reach its low at 2000 cases, whilst robbery maintained its level with some fluctuations. In 2012, car theft grew rapidly reaching its peak at 2800 cases, meanwhile robbery plateaued.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98203592814 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54129366139 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9405520949 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142125979796 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613864354568 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894901294001 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107643873929 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103777209074 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.