Q the chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crimei Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.Summarise the information
The line graph elucidates information regarding burglary, car theft and robbery in Manchester city Centre between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, it can be crystal clear that, majority of the criminals were involved in burglary in the starting but at the last car theft came on the top. In robbery, the number of criminals remains the same.
Looking closely at the picture, it can be seen that,3400 cases were noticed of burglary in Manchester city Centre in 2003which reached to 3700 in 2004.Afterwards ,a reduction was noticed in burglary from 2004 to 2008 accounted as 1100 in 2008.Then a small fluctuation was noticed from 2009 to 2012 that remained 1300 in 2012.In regard to car theft, criminals stole 2300 cars in 2003which minimized to 2000 in 2006.After it, upward and downward trend was observed regarding car theft but it went on the top among the all the crimes by reaching to 2700 at the end of given time period. Moreover, criminals showed less interest in robbery as the cases that were 600 in 2003 also ended at the same number; in between small ups and downs were found in robbery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterwards
...re in 2003which reached to 3700 in 2004.Afterwards ,a reduction was noticed in burglary fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...which reached to 3700 in 2004.Afterwards ,a reduction was noticed in burglary from...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
... 2004 to 2008 accounted as 1100 in 2008.Then a small fluctuation was noticed from 20...
^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...2009 to 2012 that remained 1300 in 2012.In regard to car theft, criminals stole 23...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... in 2003which minimized to 2000 in 2006.After it, upward and downward trend was obser...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79365079365 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58432977637 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 187.356771962 43.030603864 435% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.2 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.8 22.9334400587 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134968913754 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778786748709 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894190150151 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116119504281 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992491640531 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.