The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012
The line graph gives information about the number of crime in Manchester's several zones over a 9-year period between 2003 and 2012.
In general, the number of burglary was by far the highest in the first years, whereas car theft crimers increased during the period. Furthermore, there was a fluctuation in a robbery rate, but this remained almost the same in the years 2003 and 2012.
To be more precise, the number of burglary peaked at roughly 3700 in 2004. After it decreased significabtly to above 1000, reached an increase to almost 1500. There was a oscillation in the number of car theft during for years from 2004 and 2008. Then, the figure grew to around 2800 in the year 2012.
According to the graph, robbery only started with 500 in the first given year and climbed minimally to approximately 1900, after 2 years. This figure experienced a gradual fall by around 200 in 2010. Finally, the number of robbery dipped to over 500 in the final year.
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 67
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a 9-year period between 2003 and 2012. In general, the number of burglary was b...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the same in the years 2003 and 2012. To be more precise, the number of burgla...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d an increase to almost 1500. There was a oscillation in the number of car theft ...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grew to around 2800 in the year 2012. According to the graph, robbery only sta...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, then, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49122610034 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2066217906 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824774657182 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337011001558 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498321940674 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629393317709 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572544899722 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.