The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.
The line graph illustrates how three types of crimr, namely burglary, car theft and robbery changed in the city center of Manchester over a 9 year-period between 2003 and 2012.
In general, there was a downward trend in the number of burglary, whereas that of car theft experienced a moderate growth. In addition, the figure of robbery remained almost the same.
According to the chart, it can be seen that the number of burglary was about 3,400 in 2003. Before falling dramatically to 1,000, it reached a peak of around 3,750 in 2004. After 4 years, the figure increased by 500, from 1,000 to 1,500, and then it had mild fluctuations over the given period. Beginning with approximately 2,250, the number of car theft decreased gradually to 2,000, and it started rising rapidly from about 2,100 to 2,800 between 2008 and 2012.
As for robbery, there was a sharp rise from 500 to around 900 in 2005. The figure plateaued and stayed almost stable. In 2010, it saw a slight increase at virtually 700, and then it dropped minimally to 600 in the last given year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates how three typ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a 9 year-period between 2003 and 2012. In general, there was a downward trend i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of robbery remained almost the same. According to the chart, it can be seen t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2,100 to 2,800 between 2008 and 2012. As for robbery, there was a sharp rise f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, as for, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51943537932 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4178705392 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138607369279 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044119926118 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629284090513 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813760770986 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809545280392 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.