The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012

The line graph presents information about the variations in three different domains of Manchester city centre within a time period, from 2003 to 2012.

Overall, most significant changes are observed in burglary, where there was a negative trend throughout the years. The number of car theft, however, was seen to have an increase the number of robbery remained stable over the time span.

Burglary was the most common crime in the Manchester city, where it began with around 3400 cases during the first year and peaked at 3700 cases the year after. This proportion of burglary dramatically fell to as low as 1000 cases by 2008 and it remained steadily between 1400 to 1500 cases for the following years.

In 2003, the number of car theft was less than 2500 cases compared to burglary. However, the number rapidly increased to 2800 cases by the end of 2012. Robbery was less likely to happen in the city, with seven fold less than the number of Burglary, at 500 cases in 2003. During 2005, the number of robbery rose to 1000 cases and for the following decades, it remained stable until it reached to its original number of 500 cases in 2012

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31816737963 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2631923443 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13686515126 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656405045291 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990781995734 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114059813566 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13130997434 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.