The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph gives data about the quantity of thiefs in 3 various places of Newport city centre over a 10 year period from 2003 to 2012.
Overall,the figures for the second category,namely,burglary,car theft and robbery experienced an increase of which, the latter one had the lowest growth over the given period.
As for the category with the greatest rise,car theft took crime almost 2800 in the first 3 years.The figure had decreased by 800 incidents in 2006.After that, the category fluctuated by approximately 2500 events and till the end of the given period the number of incidents became the highest one with almost 3000 accidents.
In terms of other two sectors,namely,burglary and robbery,their events were much lower. In burglary,the number of crimes at the beginning increased by 300 events until 2004,however the figure dropped to approximately 1100 incidents. Similarly, category of robbery started with 700 events in 2003 and stayed the same over a decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-15 | Кабулбек Кабулязов | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | ngchi_3603 | view | |
| 2021-12-25 | ngchi_3603 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 61
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 61
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... year period from 2003 to 2012. Overall,the figures for the second category,namely,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , namely
...rall,the figures for the second category,namely,burglary,car theft and robbery experien...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , car
... for the second category,namely,burglary,car theft and robbery experienced an increa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , car
... for the category with the greatest rise,car theft took crime almost 2800 in the fir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... crime almost 2800 in the first 3 years.The figure had decreased by 800 incidents i...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... had decreased by 800 incidents in 2006.After that, the category fluctuated by approx...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , namely
...ccidents. In terms of other two sectors,namely,burglary and robbery,their events were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , their
... two sectors,namely,burglary and robbery,their events were much lower. In burglary,the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...heir events were much lower. In burglary,the number of crimes at the beginning incre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, similarly, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55955714581 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3468073518 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857608551978 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455094759542 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655291782446 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621696726295 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743968925707 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.