The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012

The line graph depicts the variations in number of incidents regarding to three anti-social activities that occurred in Newport center city in 2003 to 2012.

Overall, the most of changes seen in burglary crime, whereas the other two had minor fluctuations than it in given span of time.

It is clear that the first crime burglary was at highest numbers that was 3500 till 2004 after that it rapidly decreased to near about 2500 in 2006. Since, 2006 to 2008 it was again fall down and well under to the number of thousand. One year after, it increased by 500 count of crime then it stagnant at 1500 till at the last year that was 2012.

Moving further, the second highest mal-practice was car theft the total numbers that was counted about 2800, after the this it remained same until 2005 and declined in to 2000. In other time of period it demonstrated the upward trend which was accounted for around 3000 total. However, the robbery occurred almost similar in all years except 2005 and 2010 that was approximately constant at 800.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the changes') or simply say ''most changes''.
Suggestion: most of the changes; most changes
...r city in 2003 to 2012. Overall, the most of changes seen in burglary crime, whereas the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
... 2006. Since, 2006 to 2008 it was again fall down and well under to the number of th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...bers that was counted about 2800, after the this it remained same until 2005 and decline...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, second, so, then, well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71978021978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35011375419 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7660281408 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880432697637 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404464395081 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564315711537 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708643760936 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641345472281 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.