The line chart illustrates the rates of crime in the center of NewPort and its changes throughout the period of 9 years. Overall, we are presented with three different patterns for the different types of crime that are displayed on the graph.
Burglary, once leading the numbers of incident in Newport city that presented approximately 3750 incidents in 2004 displays a downwards trend, having decreased the number of incidents by more than a half in 2008. Although its incidents fell significantly, in 2012 it is still occupying the second place between the three main crimes.
As for car theft, it presents a slight decrease in the year of 2006, from approximately 3000 to 2000 episodes. Notwithstanding this, the rates started to rise again reaching the leadership in 2012 with the same amount of occurrences as in 2006: 3000.
Finally, the graph illustrates robbery as remaining relatively steady throughout the span of 10 years, remaining as the lower rate of incidents both in 2003 and 2012, with approximately 500 cases.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003-2012. 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012 95
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https blogchiasekienthuc files wordpress com 2016 11 map 1 jpg 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... crime that are displayed on the graph. Burglary, once leading the numbers of in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents in 2004 displays a downwards trend, having decreased the number of incidents...
^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n a half in 2008. Although its incidents fell significantly, in 2012 it is still ...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to rise again reaching the leadership in 2012 with the same amount of occurren...
^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith the same amount of occurrences as in 2006: 3000. Finally, the graph illust...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, still, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14792899408 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93346738678 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4909212725 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177415194243 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807671183227 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547542617522 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994546161722 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732898858267 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.