The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012

The line chart illustrates the rates of crime in the center of NewPort and its changes throughout the period of 9 years. Overall, we are presented with three different patterns for the different types of crime that are displayed on the graph. Burglary, once leading the numbers of incident in Newport city that presented approximately 3750 incidents in 2004 displays a downwards trend, having decreased the number of incidents by more than a half in 2008. Although its incidents fell significantly, in 2012 it is still occupying the second place between the three main crimes.As for car theft, it presents a slight decrease in the year of 2006, from approximately 3000 to 2000 episodes. Notwithstanding this, the rates started to rise again reaching the leadership in 2012 with the same amount of occurrences as in 2006: 3000.

Finally, the graph illustrates robbery as remaining relatively steady throughout the span of 10 years, remaining as the lower rate of incidents both in 2003 and 2012, with approximately 500 cases.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 577, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ond place between the three main crimes.As for car theft, it presents a slight dec...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, still, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11904761905 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94440165972 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.537125587 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177415194243 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087600625777 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553742670405 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116862992392 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064118312104 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.