The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012
The graph shows the differences rates of crime in the inner Newport for decade between year 2003 and year 2012, which was caused by burglary, car theft and robbery and measured by the number of incidents. According to the information, the changing rates of robbery and car theft formed a similar pattern with some fluctuation throughout this period. The figure for Burglary’s case reached the highest peak in 2004, however notably underwent a downturn trend till 2008 and remained steady till 2012.
In 2003, burglary was the most occurred crime reached nearly 3500, however after year 2004 sharply decreased by nearly 3000 in 4 years. In the same period of time, there was a small drop for car theft, but after 2006 started to grow gradually and by the middle of 2006 reached over 2000 as same as burglary. Robbery started above 500 in 2003, was the lowest among three crimes. It increased less than 500 by 2005 and then slightly declined to just 500.
Clearly, between 2008 and 2012, car theft experienced an upward trend. On the other hand, burglary and robbery went through minor fluctuation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | tieulinh4120 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | bibikulsum | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | bibikulsum | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... by nearly 3000 in 4 years. In the same period of time, there was a small drop for car theft, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93582887701 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4400970489 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4785812448 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105641115806 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420136373197 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430486264493 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661153255839 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341373043515 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.