The line graph below gives the variations that occur in three kind of areas of offence in Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012. As can be seen, the number of incidents in bulglary has shown a downward trend by rest of the period.
Overall, what stands out from the graph, large quantity happened in 2004 and it was bulglary when number of incidents was about 3800.Then we can see that the smallest amount of incidents was robbery in 2008, 500. Also, what about the car theft, between 2003 and 2005 was nearly similar, 2800, but fortunetely between 2005 and 2006 this numbers was sharply decrease to 2000 incidents.
So, fortunetely that between this period the burglary was decreasing sharply, which was about 3900 incidents in 2003 by 2012 this number became 1900. But, robbery has not changed much, in 2003 was about 600 incidents by 2012 became around 650 occurence. However, last area, car theft, in 2003 was 2900 and 2012 number of incidents the same as 2003.
To, sum up, the crime rates of in Newport city have tented to remain unchanged in the last two years period.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below gives the variations that occur i...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...ives the variations that occur in three kind of areas of offence in Newport city cen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...when number of incidents was about 3800.Then we can see that the smallest amount of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out the car theft, between 2003 and 2005 was nearly similar, 2800, but fortunetel...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
... 2005 and 2006 this numbers was sharply decrease to 2000 incidents. So, fortun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was sharply decrease to 2000 incidents. So, fortunetely that between this period...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74210526316 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21491419142 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7419346445 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110012237856 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626495129612 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544730094764 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761326086777 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410810992389 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.