The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
The pie charts compare energy production from various sources in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the percentage of energy produced from Coal was by far highest in both years. Additionally, while energy production from coal, gas, nuclear and other types of energy all increased in 2005, there was a slight decrease in the figure for Petro.
In 1995, the proportion of energy production from Coal was highest, at precisely 29.80%, while the figure for Gas was slightly lower, at 29.63%. About 29.27% of total energy was Petro compared to approximately 6.4% from nuclear, whereas other sources made up a very small percentage of the total production, at 4.9%.
In 2005, the rate of energy created from Coal increase to 30.93% and became the highest in the chart. Meanwhile, the figure for Gas rose gradually to 30.31%. By contrast, Petro's energy production was a dramatic decrease of nearly 9.72% to 19.55%. There were sharp increases in the figures for Nuclear and other sources went up to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 67
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 56
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55458611209 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7484351725 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19523588553 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101943448829 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995640212775 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166121227609 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101061450103 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.