The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The two bar charts compare graduate and postgraduate students who did not work fulltime after college graduation apart from full-time work in 2008
It is clear that most of graduate and postgraduate students in the UK decided to continue further education after leaving college, while the number of students who chose voluntary work was lowest. In addition, the number of postgraduate students who joined in part-time work was higher than that of graduate students.
In terms of graduate students, the number of students decided to further study was highest, at 29,665 while the opposite was true for voluntary work, at 3,500. Meanwhile, the figure for students who chose part-time work or unemployment was nearly the same at around 16,000 to 17,000.
In terms of postgraduate students, the number of students joined in voluntary work was lowest, at 345, while the number of students who joined part-time work and further study was 2,535 and 2,725 respectively. At the same, the figure for unemployment was slightly lower at 1,625.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1995 and 2002, and projections for 2050 67
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 56
- In some parts of the world, it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26946107784 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72561011193 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461077844311 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.6524152243 43.030603864 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297360990122 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161837729855 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152637524268 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244029969806 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163986740622 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.