Given is a chart representing the difference of cost-of-living for six distinct items in Riverdale and Cape Alicia compared to the average national percentage. It is immediately apparent that Riverdale accounted above the average of national and Cape Alicia cost-of living. Meanwhile, Cape Alicia have two items which are amounted below the rates.
First and foremost, there are four items which have been amounting higher than the national rates for both cities including groceries, utilities, health care and clothing. For all these four items Riverdale amounted around 4 to 7 percent. On the other hand, at Cape Alicia it just almost same the normal national rate by slightly higher by around 1%.
Interestingly, it is obviously shown that housing at Riverdale amounted the highest percentage among others by 19%, with the same respect housing in Cape Alicia down below 12% from the nornal national price, and suddenly this is the lower percentage that ever been measured. Looking at the detail of transportation, Riverdale and Cape Alicia have a opposite trend, by positive 4% and negative around 4% respectively, by positive showing above and negative indicating below the national cost-of-living percentage.
- The char and table below give information about healtcare resources and life expectancy in different countries. 78
- The chart below shows the cost of living averages in two different cities as compared to the national cost of living average Summarize the information by collecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France andBritain. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted the highest percentage among others by 19%, with the same respect housing in...
^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rtation, Riverdale and Cape Alicia have a opposite trend, by positive 4% and nega...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88983316717 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3454644949 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176924358629 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891154113189 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824394022785 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128916628471 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805037516173 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.