The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.

The given chart illustrates how the levels of post-school qualification differed in two different types of genders in Australia held in 1999.
In general, men had a high percentage of post-school qualification in skilled vocational diploma, postgraduate, and masters of degree, while the percentage of women having more qualifications in undergraduate and bachelor's degree. The most graduated qualification of the male was skilled vocational diploma whereas that of female was an undergraduate diploma.
It is obvious, while the qualification of skilled vocational for men was 90%, there was only 10% for the figure of the women in Australia in 1999. Moreover, The percentage of post-undergraduate diplomas for men was 40% higher than that of women, at 30%. Males graduated 60% in masters degree compared to the figure for females, at 40%.
By contrast, women had 70% undergraduate diploma, which was double that of men, at nearly 40%. While the proportion of females in bachelor’s degree was 50%, the figure of men was only 45%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-12 alpha2006sh view
2023-10-12 alpha2006sh 90 view
2022-09-19 Efuli 61 view
2022-07-26 Gulmiraa 78 view
2022-03-14 roopdeep view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while, as for, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32317073171 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33189724667 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4885870196 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267444481077 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130575578308 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124799957345 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199011394031 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133492248399 0.0819641961636 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.