The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.

The given visualization presents the 2000 statistics for global percentage of illiterate people by gender from six different areas.

It is clear from the chart that the illiteracy rates of developed nations were much smaller than those of the remaining countries. Besides, more women were unlettered than men in every part of the world.

Males and females, unable to read and write, constituted practically 0% in developed countries, while the proportions for Latin America were higher, 10% and 11% respectively, with a very small gap between men and women. In East Asia, the figure for males nearly doubled that of Carribean,standing at 20%, while females accounted for approximately 8%.

On the other hand, the rates of unschooled people in Sub-Saharan Africa were 30% and 48% respectively for men and women. A rough similar proportion was seen in Arab States, where the figure for females almost doubled that for males, 52% and 28% respectively. The highest rate of illiteracy could be found in South Asia, where 55% women and 33% men were uneducated.

To sum up, the world uneducation rates in developing nations were considerably high and the number of unlettered females was ahead of that of unschooled males in all regions.

Votes
No votes yet
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-15 dan1sland 61 view
2019-07-29 parth patel officiall 78 view
2019-07-24 PRM12 78 view
2019-07-21 aremontika 56 view
2019-07-21 aremontika 78 view
Essays by user rose_3012 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the chart that the illiteracy rates of developed nations were much smaller than...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , standing
...r males nearly doubled that of Carribean,standing at 20%, while females accounted for app...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95303703197 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0586769734 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189559685048 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797147186692 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311266633038 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102698711603 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281065925758 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.