The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart elucidates the use of transport by inhabitants in Edmonton and the table illustrates the percentage of people’s different reasons for using car in the city.
Overall, cars still gained enormous popularity in Edmonton despite the heavy dependence on alternative means of transportation. The main reason for using car was commuting to work.
It is clear that car accounted for the most popular vehicles, at 45%, which was nearly five times as much as the figure for the least proportion. The second most used method of transport was light rail transit, standing at 35%. In contrast, although people in Edmonton made good use of public transport, bus and taxi made up only 10%, the same proportion for the rest.
On the other hand, people used car mainly due to commuting to work, 55%, and business, 45%, and taking children to school, 40%. In contrast, only 15% used car for shopping and the same proportion can be seen in leisure activities.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Some people believe that students should take part in extracurricular clubs at school for total personality development, while others believe that it has detrimental effects on academic performance. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life However this is very difficult to do What are the problems associated with this What is the best way to achieve a better balance 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for using car in the city. Overall, cars still gained enormous popularity in...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., at 45%, which was nearly five times as much as the figure for the least proport...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, still, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99382716049 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75726997643 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5254620094 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171900626913 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854954773498 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374929091284 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119931985829 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221429375541 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.