the chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart illustrates the annual growth in GDP for three countries from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the figures for Tunisia decreased while that of Japan increased overtime.
Tunisia's data for GDP growth was the highest in 2007, stand for over 6%, but slightly drop to nearly 4$ in 2008 and remand unchanged from 2009 to 2010, about 3% for both years.
By contrast, the figures for Japan witnessed a significant increase from 2% in 2007 to over 6% in 2010, nearly tripled. Moreover, Japan GDP growth was also the highest data in compares with 2 other countries.
Ecuador data seem to fluctuate over the 4-year period. Firstly, it rose to nearly 5% from 3% in the first two years, from 2007 to 2008.Then witnessed a significant drop by 4%, from 5% to 1%, between 2008 and 2009. Finally, the data doubled to over 2% in the lastest year.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-14 tuanhasb60478 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$4'.
Suggestion: $4
...or over 6%, but slightly drop to nearly 4$ in 2008 and remand unchanged from 2009 ...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
... the first two years, from 2007 to 2008.Then witnessed a significant drop by 4%, fro...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 697.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64666666667 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39240464805 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6141126903 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204022376768 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997553611722 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880492277549 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137240555552 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095388829119 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.