The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the annual rate of GDP growth in various countries, namely Tunisia, Japan, and Ecuador over a four-year period from 2007 to 2010.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that the GDP growth rate in the majority of these countries decreased with the notable exception of Japan throughout the same period.
Looking at the chart in more detail, the Japanese yearly rate of GDP growth rose gradually from 2% in 2007 to over 6% in 2010, slightly more than a threefold increase. In Tunisia, however, the figures experienced a non-stop downward from approximately 6% to 3% through the years. The percentage of GDP growth in Ecuador rose and reached a peak of over 4% in 2008, followed by a significant drop to only 1% in 2009. This figure soon recovered to roughly 2% in 2010, which was the lowest among the three countries.
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays many animal species are becoming extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem others believe that humans beings are more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area 73
- The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed on time or late failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990 2000 2010 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61157968574 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0079356083 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181361867813 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839359386168 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538557391121 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123099216125 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021016878924 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.