The table illustrates data on the changes in the money invested in kiwi fruit exports to various nations from New Zealand within three years namely 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that Asian countries had a tendency to invest money in kiwi fruit exceedingly compared to others, with a notable exception of Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the figure for Mexico saw a decline, while the opposite trend is true for that of Russia over the observed period.
More specifically, Japan had the highest amount of income invested in imports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand, with above 271 million dollars in 2010, rising substantially by 50 million dollars in 2012. Meanwhile, the figure for Saudi Arabia was the lowest among all countries, with roughly 300,000 dollars in 2010, experienced a three-fold decrease throughout the research period.
Russia, despite starting at under 1 million dollars at the beginning of the period, witnessed a dramatic growth to over 2,400,000 dollars in the year of 2012. In addition, Mexican imports of kiwi fruit saw a half-drop from 6,000,000 dollars to 3,300,000 dollars between 2010 and 2012.
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 74
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 42
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 74
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 79
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1902173913 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65047499934 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8464673299 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.428571429 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232905148914 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112946959911 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101495556581 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156983675253 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894285399077 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.