The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004

The bar chart illustrates the differences in yearly payment between doctors and other employees in a variety of seven nations in 2004, measured in thousand US dollars.

Overall, it is clear that the annual salary of doctors is far exceedingly higher than that of other workers. Additionally, American doctors received the highest amount of income, whereas the opposite was true for in Finland in the observed year.

More specifically, doctors in America had the largest payment, with 120 thousands of US dollars, which was roughly three-fold higher than that of the remaining employees in other sectors in 2004. This sharply contrasted with the case of Finland, where only 50,000 and under 30,000 US dollars were paid for doctors and employees in other fields, respectively.

Meanwhile, Italy, Czech Republic, and Germany paid around 60 thousand US dollars for their doctors, the remaining workers received only one-third of that of their counterparts in the research period. French doctors, however, by 2004, had been paid approximately 70,000 US dollars each year, reaching a similar level to Switzerland.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...y of seven nations in 2004, measured in thousand US dollars. Overall, it is clear tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '120 thousand'.
Suggestion: 120 thousand
...n America had the largest payment, with 120 thousands of US dollars, which was roughly three-fol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43103448276 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79738685793 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2840834539 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341526849183 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147629508743 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584060145239 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198867753547 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049161040543 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.