The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and
2013.!
The bar chart compares the number of the mobile phones sold all over the world by five famous manufacturers in the years 2009, 2011 and 2013.
It is clear that Nokia sold the most cell phones in 2009 and 2011, Samsung became the best-selling brand in 2013. Apple and Samsung saw the biggest increases in mobile sales.
In 2009, Nokia sold about 450 million units, which was almost double the number of handsets sold by Samsung. Over the following years, Nokia experienced a considerable drop in mobile sales to 230 million units. By contrast, Samsung’s sales figures increased significantly to 450 million handsets and became the leader market with cell phone sales in 2013.
The other three top selling handy device brands from 2009 to 2013 were Apple, ZTE, LG. In 2009, these corporations sold around 25 million, 50 million, 125 million handy devices respectively, but Apple overtook the other companies in 2011. In 2013, LG saw declining sales and the figures for ZTE rose only slightly, compared to a dramatic rise in cell phone sales, approximately 150 million units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-04 | danthoai711 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Computers have made a better and safer world. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and2013.! 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01666666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5850651304 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4469963629 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202366010557 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928691588105 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521003643941 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140033567959 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384294410801 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.