The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013

The chart illustrates the comparison of the globule mobile phone sales by 5 different brands in 3 year 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall, we can see clearly that there is a stark shift from the income of Samsung in 2013 which gained 450 millions. Another striking feature is that the year 2013 experienced a substantial decrease from the income of Nokia.
Regarding Samsung, there was a success when they witnessed the upward trend in 2013 with 450 million phone being sold. Similarly, Apple soared up to approximately 150 millions in their revenue after being the least in 2019.
In contrast, downward trends were recorded by Nokia and LG. In the year 2009, Nokia dominated the communication devices with nearly 450mils before went down dramatically to 250mil and became the second prevalent brands. Regards of LG, their revenue declined modestly from 120 millions to 80 millions after every 2 years interval . In contrast, ZTE is a brand which remained unchanged after 5 years with the units being sold around 50 millions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-21 PhucHuynh 100 view
2023-03-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2023-02-17 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-01-12 AYUSH BOTHRA 73 view
2022-11-09 BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...80 millions after every 2 years interval . In contrast, ZTE is a brand which remai...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, similarly, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60411924139 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2507477293 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146416770173 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666953542727 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110287614388 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127404848999 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141002353062 0.0819641961636 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...80 millions after every 2 years interval . In contrast, ZTE is a brand which remai...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, similarly, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60411924139 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2507477293 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146416770173 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666953542727 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110287614388 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127404848999 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141002353062 0.0819641961636 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.