The information about how often people in the United States Of America ate junk food in restaurants from 2003 to 2013 is depicted by the rendered bar chart. The data has been calibrated in the percentage of people.
To begin with, 4% of people were going to restaurants for junk food every day in 2003. However, the percentage of the population who were eating junk food in hotels several times a week was around 18% in 2003. 31% and 30% of people who ate frozen food in hotels, one time in a week and one or two times in a month respectively in 2003. While there had been a drastic decrease seen in the number of individuals who ate fast food a few times a year, it accounted for nearly 14% in 2003. Only 5% of individuals were never going to fast-food places in 2003.
Moving towards, the same number of people who ate fast food on daily basis in hotels in 2006 and 2013, it was around 3%. Moreover, this trend was the same for people who were eating junk food in eating places a few times a year and never went to the fast-food places, it accounted for 15% and 4% correspondingly, in 2006 and 2013. There was a similar decrease was noticed in the proportion of people who were going to eat frozen food in hotels many times a week and one time in a week, it was almost 6%, from 2006 to 2013. Those people who were eating junk food in restaurants once or twice a month in the year 2006 and 2013, it comprised to 25% and 34% respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that there were fewer people who ate packaged food daily and who never ate junk food at eating house.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28571428571 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37078516297 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421926910299 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3713775305 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213394029076 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108076741177 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621163591008 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162475723273 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455781607083 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.